<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Change In the Wind Blog &#187; Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://changeinthewind.ca/blog/category/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://changeinthewind.ca/blog</link>
	<description>Christian weblog on socio-political and economic issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 04:48:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Article: The Supremacy of God and the Rule of Law</title>
		<link>http://changeinthewind.ca/blog/2008/12/new-article-the-supremacy-of-god-and-the-rule-of-law/</link>
		<comments>http://changeinthewind.ca/blog/2008/12/new-article-the-supremacy-of-god-and-the-rule-of-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 10:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://changeinthewind.ca/blog/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our latest article is a demonstration how these two phrases from the prologue of the Canadian Charter of Rights provide a framework for genuine liberty.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="The Supremacy of God and the Rule of Law" href="/articles/0812_supremacy_of_God_rule_of_law.php">Our latest article is a demonstration how these two phrases from the prologue of the Canadian Charter of Rights provide a framework for genuine liberty</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://changeinthewind.ca/blog/2008/12/new-article-the-supremacy-of-god-and-the-rule-of-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let Your Voice Be Heard with Canadian Gov&#8217;t</title>
		<link>http://changeinthewind.ca/blog/2008/12/let-your-voice-be-heard-with-canadian-govt/</link>
		<comments>http://changeinthewind.ca/blog/2008/12/let-your-voice-be-heard-with-canadian-govt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 23:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://changeinthewind.ca/blog/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please take part in this public consultation by Jim Flaherty, Minister of Finance. The survey lists five suggested areas of &#8220;economic stimulus&#8221; that you are supposed to rank, and also offers a sixth option, where you will be allowed to suggest your own priority on the form&#8217;s next page. What I did was make my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Federal Economic Consultation" href="http://www.fin.gc.ca/scripts/prebudgetsurvey/selectMainPriorities_e.asp">Please take part in this public consultation by Jim Flaherty, Minister of Finance</a>.</p>
<p>The survey lists five suggested areas of &#8220;economic stimulus&#8221; that you are supposed to rank, and also offers a sixth option, where you will be allowed to suggest your own priority on the form&#8217;s next page.</p>
<p>What I did was make my own priority #1, then listed the rest in the order of what I felt were most legitimate/least threatening to long term stability, and the least redistributive. The substance of my #1, of course, was that the government <em>not </em>attempt to artificially stimulate the economy, as every effort to do so requires moving assets (in the form of taxes etc) from society as a whole, or from more productive sectors, in particular, to those which are least efficient and represent the most drain on the economy.</p>
<p>I then ranked the others like this:</p>
<p><span id="more-20"></span></p>
<p>(2) infrastructure (just to acknowledge that at least some infrastructure is legitimate and necessary for government involvement);</p>
<p>(3) build strong sustainable labour markets and training incentives (my intention here is that Canada be promoting international trade, and the free market can take over);</p>
<p>(4) invest in housing (I don&#8217;t believe government should be doing this, but at least real estate usually doesn&#8217;t depreciate and the investment wouldn&#8217;t be a complete waste);</p>
<p>(5) support traditional and emerging industrial sectors (I read this primarily as &#8220;bailout the industries,&#8221; which rewards inefficiency and steals from other sectors which have learned to function productively in the current market);</p>
<p>(6) improve access to credit (my argument is that artificial intervention into the area of credit with lead to serious issues down the road &#8211; think of what happened in the United States when the bubble burst).</p>
<p>Aside from the ranking of stimulus priorities, the form also asks what can be done to help keep the economy moving. What I stressed is that clear taxation rules and low tax rates, combined with balanced government budgets, offer stability and make an economy inviting for foreign investment.</p>
<p>Take the survey and say no to the implicit national socialism that undergirds the drive for government-invented &#8220;economic stimulus.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://changeinthewind.ca/blog/2008/12/let-your-voice-be-heard-with-canadian-govt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

